Jenn at American Short Fiction blog made some great observations in an Aug 24th post:
“everybody’s been making their own lists so that everyone else can refute them flatly, and loudly.”
Exactly, Jenn–it’s on this very issue that Bookbread finds himself perplexed. Â What is this compulsion to refute, to dismiss, to accuse, to ignore which infests the landscape of book conversation?
“The books we’re arguing over—even the supposedly overrated ones, or the ones dubbed critical successes—are not the books people are buying in droves.”
Aye. Â Contrary to the Apostles of Joyce, unbought authors are neither the most read nor those best remembered.
“I think people should keep talking about the divide between popular literature and serious works—and especially the way the two are lately striving to imitate each other to stay afloat in the struggling publishing economy.”
And here Jenn reminds Bookbread of some words from Dylan: “When you’ve got nothing, you’ve got nothing to lose,”—so that in American fiction, when you’re going broke (apparently) you go for baroque.
“For whatever reason, books that bridge the seriousness divide from either side, no matter how superficially, seem to sell the absolute best.”
Yes, but which books bridge that divide?—that is the question. Â Certainly not Ulysses or Infinite Jest [NYR].